FRANKFORT, Ky. (LEX 18) – Attorney General Andy Beshear announced Monday that he will oppose a federal judge’s Dec. 14 ruling that would eliminate the Affordable Care Act in Kentucky.
Here in Frankfort, @AndyBeshearKY is commenting on the ruling from TX. Saying it “would devastate Kentuckians” if the ACA is thrown out. “It’s a battle of life versus death” @LEX18News pic.twitter.com/wY8SAtXjw1
— Conroy Delouche (@ConroyDelouche) December 17, 2018
In a 55-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor ruled Friday that last year’s tax cut bill knocked the constitutional foundation from under “Obamacare” by eliminating a penalty for not having coverage.
Beshear and a group of attorneys general have been battling the federal case – Texas et al. v. United States, et al – over the last year.
“This ruling would immediately eliminate coverage for 500,000 Kentuckians on Expanded Medicaid, and on the private insurance side would return Kentucky to a time when insurance companies could simply refuse coverage for Kentuckians based on pre-existing conditions, age and even gender,” Beshear said. “With Kentuckians facing so many needs, we cannot allow a Texas court to strip coverage away from our Kentucky families.”
Beshear identified 10 key points as to why he is fighting to keep the coverage.
- No mandatory coverage for pre-existing conditions. It is estimated that 50 percent of Kentuckians under the age of 65 suffer from a pre-existing condition. Insurance companies would be able to deny coverage to all of these individuals, and, Beshear said, “cancel coverage when a Kentuckian gets sick.”
- Elimination of Expanded Medicaid. The ruling would wipe out Medicaid expansion entirely, which has provided coverage to more than 500,000 Kentuckians. “These families would lose coverage, and the state would lose nearly $50 billion in funding, which cycles through Kentucky’s economy, resulting in a loss of tens of thousands of health care and related jobs,” Beshear said.
- Children under the age of 26 would not be able to remain on their parents’ insurance plans. The ACA requires insurance companies to let children under the age of 26 remain on their parents’ insurance plans. Those protections would be gone, leaving Kentucky families at risk. This provision is among the most popular in the law, Beshear said, because “it allows parents to cover their children during their college and early working years.”
- Seniors would have to pay more for prescription drugs. The ACA closed the so-called “donut hole” or coverage gap in Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage over time. Without the ACA, seniors would be forced to incur thousands of dollars in additional prescription drug costs.
- Women would once again be charged more than men. The ACA eliminated gender discrimination in health care. Without the ACA, insurance companies can charge women more than they can charge men for health care, solely based on their gender.
- Guaranteed pregnancy coverage would be eliminated. Before the ACA, Beshear said it was virtually impossible to access quality pregnancy coverage in the private market. “Insurers would charge astronomical sums for special, separate policies that imposed lengthy waiting periods before they even went into effect,” he said. “The result was that women didn’t get vital prenatal care, and their babies were more likely to be born too early and suffer from preventable complications.”
- Substance Use Disorder Treatment would no longer be a required benefit. The ACA has been a vital tool to help Kentucky fight the opioid epidemic because the law requires insurance plans to cover substance abuse treatment on par with other services. The Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky reported a 740 percent increase in substance abuse services for Medicaid expansion beneficiaries, and a 400 percent increase in the number of Kentuckians with traditional Medicaid receiving substance abuse treatment from 2014 to 2016.
- Rural hospitals would suffer. Studies have repeatedly shown that rural hospitals are more likely to close in states that have not expanded Medicaid. Kentucky hospitals have received billions from Medicaid expansion, and without that critical funding, Beshear said many would find themselves in dire financial straits, jeopardizing thousands of good-paying jobs in the neediest areas of the state.
- Children would lose access to no-cost immunizations and well-child visits. The ACA guarantees that parents can ensure their children receive life-saving immunizations free of charge. Those protections would be gone, and parents would have to pay staggeringly high sums for vaccines once again, Beshear said.
- Older Kentuckians would be charged vastly more than younger ones. The ACA guarantees that older Kentuckians can never be charged more than three times as much as younger ones for health insurance. Those protections would be eliminated, making it virtually certain that insurance costs for older Kentuckians, particularly those in the 55-64 age range, would skyrocket, Beshear said, “making insurance essentially unavailable to older hard-working Kentuckians whose jobs don’t provide it.”
Beshear is joined by attorneys general in California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia.
Twenty Republican-led states brought the lawsuit. After Trump ordered the Justice Department to stop defending the health law, a coalition of ACA-supporting states took up the defense.